Estimating the cost to construct new towers (monopole, lattice, and guyed) of the same functionality can help build fair values for your network assets across geographies. CostQuest creates replacement cost new models, where possible, to generate alternatives to book values. These models not only satisfy transfer tax and asset allocation jurisdictional requirements but can also be incorporated into USPAP-compliant reports by our ASA appraisers. We’ve valued networks all over the U.S. and have network experts on staff to build your model.
Why fair market value for cell towers matter



MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
PROPERTY TAXES
PRICING & RATE MAKING
Our goal in the valuation process is to produce a well-documented and supportable opinion of value that shows that an appraiser has considered all factors that affect the value of the assets being appraised.
Full ASA Appraisal
We work with you from start to finish to build a USPAP compliant report and can testify if needed.
Modeling Support
We join your existing team to build part of the appraisal report.
The cost approach, commonly used by appraisers to assess the fair market value of property, comes in two variations: reproduction cost and replacement cost. In both scenarios, an appraiser starts with a value, then deducts for the loss in value caused by physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and external obsolescence.
We specialize in the replacement cost new approach
Where the reproduction cost new is the cost of constructing an exact replica of the property at current prices with the same or closely related materials, the replacement cost new is the cost of a new property with similar functional utility.
The replacement cost new approach tends to be the proper starting point for developing the value of a cell tower site because it’s often more practical to replace property than to build an exact replica.
Benefits of the replacement cost new approach

Eliminate Ghost Assets

Capture the Impact of Upgrades

Site Optimization Changes its Cost

Excess Costs Can Be Removed
Factors that influence cell tower valuation

Location parameters that impact cell tower valuation
Step 1
Physical location
The location of a tower site is a critical factor in the determination of certain conditions and costs that are attributable to the site valuation.
Step 2
Structure type
Tower sites are distinguished by structure type (e.g., monopoles, self-support or ‘lattice’, and guyed) and RCN models need to reflect the specific structure type currently at each location.
Step 3
Structure height
The height of a tower is a key site element and has a significant impact on site design and cost. The CostQuest RCN valuation model can be applied to a wide range of tower heights from 50 to more than 1,000 feet.
Trusted by your peers in telecom















